PARASHAT NASO -June 7, 2008 (4 Sivan
5768)
HOW DO WE COUNT?
By Scott Taryle
In a scene in the Monty Python film, Life of
Brian, a crowd of thousands of followers of the reluctant
messiah Brian declare, in perfect unison, "Yes, we are all
individuals!" One man in the crowd turns aside and whispers, "I'm
not." This humorous bit of irony (albeit from a satire of the
Christian Bible), brings to mind an important theme and source of
tension in Judaism, the importance of the individual in relation to
the community in Jewish worship.
The Book of Numbers earns its English name well
in its first two parashot, BaMidbar and Naso. Each is teeming with
numbers and statistics. Yet within all that data is a subtle
message regarding our role as individuals and members of the Jewish
community.
The beginning of Naso is a continuation of a
theme begun in last-week's parasha, BaMidbar. God commands Moses to
conduct a census of all men age 30 to 50 in each of the three
families of the tribe of Levi (i.e. the descendants of the three
sons of Levi): Kohath, Gershon, and Merari. The census is connected
to the assignment of various functions to be performed in by each
Levite family in transporting, maintaining and setting up the
Mishkan and its holy objects. The census results (at least as
reported) reveal something curious. The totals for men in the
described age group in each of the Levite families happen to be
"round" numbers ending in zero. Of the descendants of Kohath, there
were 2,750; of the descendants of Gershon, 2,630; and of Merari,
3,200; and of all three combined, a sum of 8,580. Can it be mere
coincidence that the numbers from each Levite family happen to be
multiples of ten? Assuming these are accurate figures, the odds of
such a random occurrence would be one in one-thousand!
The census of the Levites in Naso follows a
similar census in parashat BaMidbar of all men age 20 and older
capable of military service in each of the other tribes of Israel.
Surprisingly, the figures for each tribe in that census bear an
even more "rounded" appearance, each coming out to an exact
multiple of 100. For example, military-age men from the tribe of
Reuven number 46,500; from Shimon, 59,700; and from Yehuda, 74,600.
The one exception is Gad: 45,650, which is nevertheless a "round"
multiple of 50. Such numbers lead one to ponder whether the census
figures in Naso and BaMidbar were indeed accurate head counts of
every individual male in each tribe and age/group. Is it possible
that the numbers were instead merely "ballpark" figures, rounded
off to the nearest ten? If so, how do we reconcile that with the
exactitude we usually attribute to the written Torah?
One possible explanation lies in the
traditional prohibition or aversion to counting Jews. As Hosea
eloquently states in the haftarah for BaMidbar, "Yet, the number of
the children of Israel shall be as the sand of the sea, which
cannot be measured or numbered." (Hosea, Ch. 2, v.1.) In a prior
census in parashat Ki-Tissa, the Israelites were counted indirectly
through the collection of a half-shekel from each individual. Even
today, census-taking in the State of Israel remains controversial,
and it is traditional to recite a ten-word sentence rather than
actual numbers when counting Jews for a minyan. Perhaps in Naso,
the reporting of rounded figures rather than exact, per capita
numbers (assuming that is the case) may have been intended as
another way to avoid the direct counting of individuals. In other
words, rather than counting the Levites as individuals, the census
takers counted them as groups of ten.
Whether intended or not, the reporting of
census figures in tens suggests something significant about our
role as individual members of the Jewish community. The purpose of
the census of the Levites in Naso was to apportion the labor of
carrying and setting up the holy objects and materials of the
Mishkan, which was central to our communal worship of God during
our sojourn in the Sinai wilderness. For that purpose, an exact
head count of individuals may not have been necessary. More
important was a general assessment of the families, tribes,
communities needed to ensure the continuity of worship in the
Mishkan, which could safely be measured in tens.
Ten happens to be the minimum number of Jewish
adults required for a minyan, essential to Jewish communal worship
today after the destruction of the Mishkan's successors, the two
Temples. Although individual prayer and worship may be meritworthy
and sincere, the Jewish ideal is worship as a minyan, a kahal, a
community. According to traditional sources, individual prayers are
heard only when accompanied by "kavanah" (directedness, sincerity
of purpose), but God hears the communal prayers of a minyan with or
without kavanah. "Hence a person must join himself with the
community, and should not pray by himself so long as he is able to
pray with the community." (Maimonides, Hilkhot Tefillah 8.1.) The
counting of the three Levite families in multiples of ten may thus
be a reminder of the greater importance of communities, minyanim,
in the worship of God.
Nevertheless, the individual is not meaningless
or unimportant in Jewish worship. Just as every person is created
in the image of God, and yet unique, each Jewish soul is
significant, not merely one in a conglomeration of numbers, rounded
off to the nearest ten, fifty or one hundred. Interestingly, among
the various censuses conducted in BaMidbar and Naso, there is one
whose result is not reported as a round "zero" figure, the counting
of first born males from all tribes of Israel combined (i.e.
excluding Levi), a total of 22,273! In contrast to the seemingly
rounded figures in the other counts, the number 22,273 rings with
precision. Why? The purpose of that census was to determine the
number of firstborn who must be redeemed by the kohenim. (The
entire tribe of Levi was to be consecrated to service in the
Mishkan in place of the first born of all Israel. To ensure that
this was an "even trade," it was therefore necessary to calculate
the total number of first born in excess of the total of Levites,
which worked out to 273. Those 273 were then redeemed at five
shekels a piece, collected by Aharon.) This suggests that
notwithstanding the preference for communal worship, for purposes
of consecration to God's service, and redemption, we are viewed as
individuals, who each matter and must be counted
precisely.
The interplay between our roles as individual
Jews and as members of the community is dramatically illustrated by
the Birkat haKohenim, the Priestly Blessing, a moving and eloquent
highlight of parashat Naso. God, through Moses, commands Aharon and
his sons, "In this way you shall bless the children of Israel; you
shall say unto them: 'The Lord Bless you and keep you. The Lord
make His face to shine upon you, and be gracious to you. The Lord
lift up his countenance upon you and give you peace.'" In the
Hebrew text, " you" is stated in the singular rather than the
plural throughout this blessing. Although the Kohenim are to
administer this blessing to the entire community assembled outside
the Miskhan, the blessing is therefore bestowed upon each Jew as an
individual.
As individuals, and as members of the greater
community, our prayers and worship matters. We count.
|